Effects of a genistein-rich extract on PSA levels in men with a history of prostate cancer

deVere White, Ralph W, Robert M Hackman, Stephanie E Soares, Laurel A Beckett, Yueju Li and Buxiang Sun

Urology. 2004. 63(2):259-63.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether supplemental amounts of soy isoflavone genistein-rich extract) would lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels more than 50% in patients with prostate cancer (CaP). METHODS: A total of 62 men (mean age 73.6 years, range 61.4 to 89.3) with histologically proven CaP who had two consecutive elevated PSA readings were accrued during a 13-month period. An open-label pilot study was conducted for 6 months in which the patients took capsules containing the genistein-rich extract three times daily by mouth. The subjects were in one of five groups: after radical retropubic prostatectomy (n = 9), after radiotherapy (n = 17), after both radical retropubic prostatectomy and radiotherapy (n = 6), off-cycle during hormonal therapy (intermittent hormones; n = 14), or active surveillance (n = 16). The primary endpoint for the trial was a 50% reduction in the PSA level at 6 months compared with before treatment. RESULTS: Of the 62 men enrolled, 52 were available for evaluation at 6 months. Three patients discontinued because of adverse events (diarrhea) and seven because of personal choice. One of 52 patients had a more than 50% reduction in the PSA level (1.9% response, 95% confidence interval 0.1% to 10.3%). An additional 7 patients had PSA reductions that were less than 50%. All 8 patients with lower PSA levels at 6 months were in the active surveillance (watchful waiting) treatment subgroup. Repeated measure regression models allowing for correlation between initial levels and change also indicated a decline in PSA in this group compared with other groups: 0 of 52 had a complete response, 9 (17%) had a partial response, 8 (15%) had stable disease, and 35 (67%) had disease progression. In the 9 patients with a partial response, 6 had pathologic findings that were moderately differentiated, 2 had well-differentiated findings, and 1 had poorly differentiated findings. Therefore, the response in this group of patients did not appear to be driven by the Gleason score. The total testosterone level was lowered in one of the patients responding, but it was higher in five others. CONCLUSIONS: A genistein-rich extract as the sole treatment for CaP did not reduce PSA levels by 50% or more in 51 of 52 subjects. Thus, it does not appear to be an effective treatment for CaP when given alone. However, 8 of 13 evaluated patients in the active surveillance group had either no rise or a decline in PSA levels of less than 50%. More study is warranted for those choosing active surveillance.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma/blood/*drug therapy/radiotherapy/surgery; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Progression; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use; Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use; Follow-Up Studies; Genistein/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Proteins/*blood; *Phytotherapy; Pilot Projects; Plant Extracts/*therapeutic use; Prostate-Specific Antigen/*blood; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms/blood/*drug therapy/radiotherapy/surgery; Protein-Tyrosine Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors; Reishi/chemistry; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Soybeans/*chemistry; Testosterone/blood; Treatment Failure; Tumor Markers, Biological/*blood



Close Window

UC Davis Health System is pleased to provide this information for general reference purposes only. It should not be considered as a substitute for professional medical advice. You are urged to consult with your health care provider for diagnosis of and treatment for any health-related condition. The information provided herein may not and should not be used for diagnosis and treatment.

Reproduction of material on this web site is hereby granted solely for personal use. No other use of this material is authorized without prior written approval of UC Regents.